Monday, July 20, 2020
Third-Person Omniscient Heres What You Should Know Before Writing With It Perhaps one of the oldest forms of narrative, the third-person omniscient perspective was the standard point of view for most 19th-century novels, including works by Leo Tolstoy and Charles Dickens. And it certainly hasnt lost its status as a favored storytelling method. Philip Pullman made great use of the narrative approach in the His Dark Materials trilogy, Cormac McCarthys fatalistic western Blood Meridian uses third-person omniscient point of view, and The Game of Thrones is likewise popular with its omniscient narrative approach. Its a particularly favorite narrative choice for Sci-Fi and Fantasy genres and was Tolkiens choice for The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings.What is third-person omniscient point of view?In its simplest definition, third-person omniscient point of view takes an all-knowing approach to narrative technique, as the narrator knows or can access what any character is doing, thinking, or feeling, at any point of the story. The narrator also knows the end and can reveal pieces of information from this god-like perspective that limited narrators cannot reveal.The beauty of third-person omniscient point of view is an element of objective reliability or truthfulness to the plot. The third-person omniscient narrator is as close to a reliable narrator as you can get. And while the narrator might certainly interject their own humor, thoughts, judgments or personality into the narration, the reader knows that the narrator has seen it from the birds eye point of view and is, therefore, to be believed. This forms a sense of intimacy with the narrator but can have the negative effect of placing emotional distance between the characters and the reader.What does third-person omniscient point of view look like?The best way to understand third-person omniscient perspective is to look at how it has been used in classic literature of the past. For example, the following excerpt from William Goldings Lord of the Flies uses a third-person omniscient point of view:Within the diamond haze of the beach something dark was fumbling along. Ralph saw it first and watched till the intentness of his gaze drew all eyes that way. Then the creature stepped from mirage on to clear sand, and they saw that the darkness was not all shadow but mostly clothing. The creature was a party of boys, marching approximately in step in two parallel lines and dressed in strangely eccentric clothing. Shorts, shirts, and different garments they carried in their hands; but each boy wore a square black cap with a silver badge on it. Their bodies, from throat to ankle, were hidden by black cloaks which bore a long silver cross on the left breast and each neck was finished off with a hambone frill. The heat of the tropics, the descent, the search for food, and now this sweaty march along the blazing beach had given them the complexions of newly washed plums. The boy who controlled them was dressed in the same way though his cap badge was golden. When his party was about ten yards from the platform he shouted an order and they halted, gasping, sweating, swaying in the fierce light. The boy himself came forward, vaulted on to the platform with his cloak flying, and peered into what to him was almost complete darkness.William Golding, Lord of the FliesA narrator of distinctionOne great benefit to the third-person omniscient point of view is the way in which it allows a writer to juxtapose the narrator against the rest of the characters in the story. The narrator sits outside of it (the plot) but entertains running commentary on it all the same, allowing writers to create narrators who are historians of sortsâ"narrators who introduce the reader to an (often) epic world to which he or she holds the keys. The reader can learn as little or as much about the world as the narrator allows. This makes the persona of the narrator far more important than it is for narrators with limited viewpoints, but one that must be crafted carefully to avoid confusio n for the reader.Think of the third-person omniscient narrator as a director of a movie. The director will move from cinematic, sweeping vista shots to allowing the audience to hear intimate conversations between characters, while also casting a certain tone on the storyâ"whether fatalistic, or optimistic, or romantic. The narrator plays a large role in setting the tone, and in such, plays a role that is as important (but different) than that of the characters.It is important to keep in mind however that its never a good idea to reveal the narrator or give him/her a name in third-person omniscient point of view. Let him or her be the all-seeing eye, but never known as part of the story or cast of characters.So 19th-century novels used itâ"does it work today?Run an Internet search on all things third-person omniscient and youll find multiple articles arguing against its effectiveness as a narrative viewpoint for modern readers. In fact, some insiders of the publishing industry will argue that publishers dont want to read manuscripts in this point of view because there are too many potential problems a writer can encounter with it. And there is some truth to the complications the perspective can cause in a story. However, despite the pros of using third-person omniscientâ"and of course, the parade of literary giants who have used it successfully in the pastâ"its important to keep in mind there are some cons to it, as well. Lets look at both for a moment.The prosAll history and backstory to be revealed in the story can happen naturally with a third-person omniscient narrator, without having to craft it into character dialogue or flashbacks.Dramatic irony.Writing in third-person omniscient perspective allows the narrator to reveal details to the reader that the characters dont know about (yetâ¦or maybe ever). Its a great device for building tension in a story.Writing in third-person omniscient allows a writer to try on many different character voices and pers pectives that would otherwise be limited in other points of view.The consRevealing too much, too soon. From his or her god-like vantage point, a third-person omniscient narrator tells the story as a historian wouldâ"someone who knows how the story will end and plays a role in guiding the reader toward the resolution. This makes it easy for the narrator to reveal too much too soon or provide too many foreshadowing moments that are forced upon the reader.Head hopping. Head hopping is the term used by writers to describe the process of describing a scene through multiple character points of view. While some writers have managed to pull it off successfully (the opening of Cider House Rules comes to mind), it can be disorienting for the reader and should be avoided unless the writer is highly skilled in keeping the flow of the scene going without confusion. This type of perspective shift can be one of the benefits to using third-person omniscient point of view but can be jarring if not done well.Overdoing asides and lectures. Admittedly, for every rule to writing there is a successful writer who will break that rule, but unless your talent is right up there with the likes of Tolkien, overdoing asides and lectures can hurt the flow of action. This diversion of your readers attention is a gamble, so use it sparingly and only if it adds significantly to the interior or exterior worlds you are creating.Telling instead of showing. Theres no doubt that good writing is that which shows instead of tells. With the added benefit of a third-person omniscient narrator comes the potential pitfall of telling your reader too much instead of showing it. Its great to have a god-like perspective to guide your readers through the plot, but just as revealing too much too soon can have a negative effect on the outcome, so can telling too much in the first place.So, lets get to the pointâ"should I use it?One of a writers most intense challenges with writing and publishing a story is d etermining point of view. Just as narrative style deeply affects the overall outcome of a story as a work of art, it also affects the creative process an author goes through to write it in the first place.Simply putâ"the narrative style you choose could make or break the success of your story, so its crucial to know which one is best to use for the type of story you want to tell, and how to use it correctly. That said, third-person omniscient point of view, while being one of the oldest forms of narrative style, is also the most technically difficult to pull off in many stories. There is great benefit to using an all-knowing narrator who can reveal the innermost thoughts and feelings of multiple characters in a story, but with great power comes great responsibility (as the saying goes).How do you know if your story will work in this narrative style? First, consider whether your tale is more character driven or plot driven. If the former, third-person omniscient will be a less intim ate approach as, for example, first-person narrative. If the later, and you are telling a story of epic worlds or cross-generational adventure, third-person omniscient might just workâ"but tread carefully. The masters of third-person omniscient like Dickens and Tolstoy are big shoes to fill.
Thursday, May 21, 2020
The most favourite misguided beliefs with regards to teamwork is actually which the expertise involving team members will be more critical in comparison with his or her power, attention in addition to travel for your responsibilities. Another favourite fantasy is actually which members aren t singularly responsible for the particular success as well as failures of these teams. In reality that men and women would be the tiniest models inside their teams and that his or her personalized skills influence several outcomes within their teams. Teams typically happen while employees agree to accomplish one common purpose. Teamwork from the place of work not merely gains your current individuals and also substantially impacts in your smallÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦In case a staff fellow member isn t effective in details, they will never become effective in details. It is advisable to determine as long as they perform the remaining with their job very well and if thus, associate these to gether with somebody else who can guide coast way up their particular lack of. 2. Inspire Visibility Squads are usually as being similar to households, as well as I should permit these operation items available on their own. As soon as items start to go wrong, compile people who are certainly not acquiring combined as well as cause them to sort out their particular problems. Never allow these places a person in the centre of any he / she said/she explained predicament. Much of my job would be to guide the business friends fully grasp the other better. This process can feel unpleasant, however as long as they find out that a go-to technique would be to take these collectively to operate that available, they will start off hoping in which on their own all of which will solely require a person whenever absolutely necessary. 3. Identify Ground Rules My staff members had to know how I wish to perform. Now I am the team manager. I will be great together with speaking about difficulty any task as well as a technique, however I persist in which everyone contribute concepts with regard to decision. As soon as problems come up, and
Wednesday, May 6, 2020
Louis Armstrong and His Music Ã¢â¬Å"The essence of jazz- making something new out of something old, making something personal out of something shared- has no finer exemplar than Armstrong.Ã¢â¬ (Hasse par. 3) During the 1920Ã¢â¬â¢s a young African American man, otherwise known as Louis Armstrong, helped create and represent a new twist on popular music. This music that became so famous and well loved today is also referred to as jazz. Louis Armstrong had a very successful jazz career performing and composing popular jazz hits in the 1920Ã¢â¬â¢s. Louis Armstrong was born on August 4, 1901 in the city of New Orleans, Louisiana. He not only grew up in poverty but also in the area nicknamed Ã¢â¬Å"The Battlefield.Ã¢â¬ (Ã¢â¬Å"Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬ Britannica par. 1) WhenÃ¢â¬ ¦show more contentÃ¢â¬ ¦Daisy Parker was a prostitute and their marriage did not last long. Violence and arguments ended the marriage in 1923. (Ã¢â¬Å"Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬ par. 4) Meanwhile, ArmstrongÃ¢â¬â¢s music career began to grow. He played in a band on a riverboat led by Fate Marable. (Ã¢â¬Å"Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬ par. 5) Ã¢â¬Å"Armstrong, fondly known as Ã¢â¬ËSatchmoÃ¢â¬â¢ (which is short for Ã¢â¬Ësatchel mouthÃ¢â¬â¢ referring to the size of his mouth) or Ã¢â¬ËPopsÃ¢â¬â¢, had a sense of humor, natural and unassuming manner, and positive disposition that made everyone around him feel good.Ã¢â¬ (Ã¢â¬Å"Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬ par. 1) New Orleans had a very diverse population. Both European and African origins made many different cultural influences. (Bergreen par. 2) Jazz was very popular in the 1920Ã¢â¬â¢s. People had money to spend on entertainment like dance halls and clubs. Radios and records were popular so people did not have to travel far to hear music they enjoyed. (Matthews par. 4) All sorts of new dances came about and people loved them. The Charleston, tap dance, and other swinging dances all derived from fads of African Americans. (Ã¢â¬Å"Harlem RenaissanceÃ¢â¬ par. 9) Famous songs from Armstrong in the 20Ã¢â¬â¢s include Ã¢â¬Å"Big Butter and Egg ManÃ¢â¬ , Ã¢â¬Å"Hotter Than ThatÃ¢â¬ , Ã¢â¬Å"StruttinÃ¢â¬â¢ With Some BarbequeÃ¢â¬ , Ã¢â¬Å"Potato Head BluesÃ¢â¬ , and Ã¢â¬Å"S.O.L. BluesÃ¢â¬ . (Hasse par. 1) The summer of 1922, in search of fame and fortune, Armstrong headed to Chicago where he knew a man by the name of King Oliver. For the next two years he was an activeShow MoreRelatedLouis Armstrong s Life, His Music And Influence On Others1565 Words Ã |Ã 7 Pagesdo my project on is Louis Armstrong. I chose Louis Armstrong because I wanted to do my project on a singer as well as a musician. I chose him because he was one of the few people that I knew about, also because I did some research on him and listened to his music and I thought that he was interesting to write about. My main three things that IÃ¢â¬â¢m going to discuss about Louis Armstrong will be his life, his music and influence on others. IÃ¢â¬â¢m going to describe how and where Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬â¢s grew upRead MoreLouis Armstrong And Jazz Age1128 Words Ã |Ã 5 Pagesof satire. Music also plays a big role in The Great Gatsby. One singer that was popular in the 1920s was Louis Armstrong he was known as the King of Jazz. Louis Armstrong was born on August 4, 1901 in New Orleans, Louisiana. Armstrong was born and raised in New Orleans he was the son of a prostitute and an absent father. Louis Armstrong grew up with his grandparents because his parents had separated and left him. His mother finally came back, but then left once more. Louis Armstrong grew up aroundRead MoreThe Most Influential Jazz Artists History And Thee Most Important Figure Essay1347 Words Ã |Ã 6 Pages Louis Armstrong is to be considered one of the most influential jazz artists history and thee most important figure in jazz history. From the 1920Ã¢â¬â¢s all the way through the 1960Ã¢â¬â¢s, Armstrong had a very illustrious career. Armstrong was a composer, instrumentalist, arranger and a singer. Giving him many ways to have an everlasting legacy in music. He innovated many different styles and excelled in many different eras of jazz. Armstrong made an abundant of contributions to jazz ranging from new stylesRead MoreLouis Ar mstrong : An Era Of Fast Beat And Improvised Style1121 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesHistory). The roots of Jazz music go back as far as slavery in the 1600s. As Africans were taken from their homes and forced to come to North America, they were able to keep many of their traditions, one including music (January, Brendan, and Francois Roca). Through the years, African music styles combined with European instruments to create the most popular form of music in the twentieth century, jazz (January, Brendan, and Francois Roca). One person who made a large impact on music of the twentieth centuryRead MoreEssay on Biography of Louis Armstrong1423 Words Ã |Ã 6 Pagesthem. Louis ArmstrongÃ¢â¬â¢s life was similar to this. Armstrong strived and strived until he reached to a point in his life where he was comfortable with his fourth wife, Lucille Wilson. Armstrong is ultimately known as the creator of jazz and blues. He was awarded this title by using his talents when he was a young boy growing u p in a rough neighborhood. ArmstrongÃ¢â¬â¢s talent was a result of his childhood and young adult life. Growing up, Armstrong was exposed to music in his surroundings. Armstrong obtainedRead MoreThe Legacy Of Louis Armstrong Essay1401 Words Ã |Ã 6 PagesLouis Armstrong, one of the most influential figures in jazz music, enjoyed a career that spans across 50 years, and through different eras of jazz. NicknamedÃ¢â¬ SatchmoÃ¢â¬ , Ã¢â¬Å"PopsÃ¢â¬ , andÃ¢â¬ Ambassador SatchÃ¢â¬ , Armstrong could do it all, he sang, occasionally acted, composed music, but was most famous for his cornet and trumpet playing. Although Armstrong is well known for his amazing trumpet play, he also influenced the direction that jazz music during his time was headed. Over the course of this paper IRead MoreMusic is an art that has been in this world for tens of thousands of years and has proven its900 Words Ã |Ã 4 PagesMusic is an art that has been in this world for tens of thousands of years and has proven its abilities to bring people together and sometimes even make people happy. Although the jazz era ended almost a century ago, this time influenced by Louis Armstrong was a huge cultural shift that still remains in our society in which African-Americans are a vast part of our music industry amongst pop, rap, reggae, and more. Jazz was a unique form of music, there had never been anything like it before. ItRead MoreThe Music Of New Orleans Jazz1223 Words Ã |Ã 5 PagesMusic is a form of art that is expressed through the creation of sound based on several cultures throughout the world. New Orleans Jazz is a genre of music originating in the 19th century that allowed people, especially of African American decent, to feel to express their love and excitement for the jubilant music. Jazz is a unique style of music that is often performed by brass band musicians using simple instruments to create a distinctive musical sound. Two distinguished musicians, Louis ArmstrongRead MoreKing Of Jazz : Louis Armstrong1617 Words Ã |Ã 7 PagesJazz - Louis Armstrong At the mention jazz music, that person will first think of is likely to be a great figure with a clown image, nicknamed Satchmo. The man was Louis Armstrong. He is a husky singer, often with a trumpet in his hand. He played dramatic works of simple structure in Orleans jazz style and with the accompaniment of Dick jazz music. Each of the books on jazz music will mention his name. Louis Armstrong was to jazz music what Bach is to classical music, Presley is to rock music (BerrettRead MoreLouis Armstrong And The Harlem Renaissance950 Words Ã |Ã 4 Pagesit is a genre of music that uses mainly brass, woodwind, and piano. It became popular in the 20th century during the Harlem Renaissance where many famous jazz artists arose. Louis Armstrong was one of the most well known jazz artist of his time. Louis Armstrong was a trumpeter, bandleader, singer, soloist, film star, and comedian. He was considered one of the most influential artists in jazz history. Louis Armstrong was a famous musi cian during the Harlem renaissance because of his skills with a trumpet
His home in England was near the main gathering point for the D-Day invasion. Along with his fathers service in World War I, Keegan felt himself drawn towards the military and its workings. Unfortunately Keegan was unable to serve in the British Military due to a childhood illness. We will write a custom essay sample on War and Politics: Are both one in the same or any similar topic only for you Order Now Although Keegan was unable to serve his country, he was determined to find his way into some aspect of the military. With a degree at Oxford, Keegan became a military historian. This essay will take a look into Keegans work, A History of Warfare, and his thesis that war is not a continuation of politics. This essay will refute his thesis with evidence from Clausewitz, fallacies in Keegans novel and military conflicts over the past thirty years. Keegan has dissected the workings of the military and the military soldier. In his novel A History of Warfare, Keegan disputes the Clausewitzen theory that war is the continuation of policy by other means. Keegan supports his theory by giving explanations of how Clausewitzens theory is invalid. To understand Keegans position one must first be familiar with Clausewitz. Clausewitz was a Prussian regimental officer during the Napoleonic wars. Upon retirement, he wrote the book On War. The books main thesis was war is the continuation by policy by other means. Keegan disagrees with Clausewitz by saying: Such at statement implies the existence of states, of state interests and of rational calculation about how they may be achieved. Yet war antedates the state, diplomacy and strategy by many millennia. Clausewitz, a child of Aristotle, went no further than to say that a political animal is war making animal. Neither dared confront the thought that man is a thinking animal in whom the intellect directs the urge to hunt and the ability to kill. Keegan suggests that war precedes states by many millenniums. First, Clausewitzs thesis does not imply there must be existence of states. Perhaps the political entity of the state did not exist but tribal life did. The tribe is a political entity. The bible has many accounts of tribal warfare for political gain. It varies from Moses leaving Egypt to David defeating Goliath. Keegan also states that war precedes diplomacy and strategy as well. The bible also recounts many strategies and diplomacy between tribes and states. Some historians might object to the bible being a reliable source but no one can refute that what happened in the bible was not true or accurate. We are cultural animals and it is the richness of our culture which allows us to accept our undoubted potentiality for violence but to believe nevertheless that its expression is a cultural aberration. History lessons remind us that the states in which we live, their institutions, even their laws, have come to us through conflict, often of the most bloodthirsty sort. Keegan is referring to the statement made by Aristotle in which he said, Man is a political animal. Keegan said that Clausewitz is a child of Aristotle and he believes that a political animal is a war-making animal. Keegan refutes them by saying, Neither dared confront the thought that man is a thinking animal in whom the intellect directs the urge to hunt and the ability to kill. How can he say that he disagrees with Clausewitzs theory when he himself claims that the states we live in now have come to be by conflict Doesnt that support Clausewitzs theory The point about neither Aristotle nor Clausewitz confront the fact that man is a thinking animal is a bit confusing. Yes man is a thinking animal and throughout history there has been countless rulers, dictators and emperors who have used war to gain political control. A prime example would be the conflict between Julius Caesar and Pompey. While Caesar was in Gaul waging war, he used agents to dominate politics in Rome. Caesar used politics and military strength to seize control of Rome and become the emperor. Man is a thinking animal and those in power, especially in the early years of history, were continually thinking on how to get more. Keegans big fallacy is his statement; Politics played no part in the conduct of the First World War worth mentioning. He goes on to say; The Germans, French, British and Russians found themselves apparently fighting war for wars sake. The wars political objects, difficult enough to define in the first place, were forgotten. Political restraints were overwhelmed, politicians who appealed to reason were execrated, and politics even in the liberal democracies was rapidly reduced to a mere justification of bigger battles, longer casualty lists, costlier budgets and overflowing human misery. The Encarta Encyclopedia states the following; The underlying causes of World War I were the spirit of intense nationalism that permeated Europe throughout the 19th and into the 20th century, the political and economic rivalry among the nations, and the establishment and maintenance in Europe after 1871 of large armaments and of two hostile military alliances. The fundamental causes of he conflict were rooted deeply in the European history of the previous century, particularly in the political and economic policies that prevailed on the Continent after 1871, the year that marked the emergence of Germany as a great world power. Keegan fails to give one argument supporting his statement. How he can say that politics played no role worth mentioning is beyond me. He not only gives no arguments but goes on to say, we are nevertheless right to see Clausewitz as the ideological father of the First World War, just as we are right to perceive Marx as the ideological father of the Russian Revolution. The appalling fate that those armies brought upon themselves by their dedication to it may be Clausewitzs enduring legacy. To compare Clausewitz and Marx is stretching it a bit. To blame Clausewitz for World War I is ludicrous. Once again Keegan fails to support his theory. Keegan goes on to say that Clausewitz is the ideological father of World War I. One can concur that if Keegan states Clausewitzs is to blame for World War I then wouldnt he be supporting Clausewitzs theory If war is the continuation of politics and Clausewitz is to blame, then isnt it correct to say that war is the continuation of politics Keegan he was not the only one who had this theory. Radical military writers such as the British historian B. H. Liddell Hart had such theories as well. He accuses him of urging the largest possible offensive with the largest possible numbers as the key to victory. Later Liddells thoughts were dismissed. Keegan, adhering to Liddells theory, once again has himself in a no win situation. He has stated that man is a thinking animal so shouldnt man be intelligent enough to figure out war and conflict without going to the past Shouldnt a general wage his own war, not an officer who wrote a book in the past Keegan concludes his theory with these thoughts; Culture is a prime determinant of the nature of warfare, as the history of its development. Politics must continue; war cannot. That is not to say that the role of the warrior is over. The world community needs, more than it has ever needed, skilful and disciplined warriors who are ready to put themselves at the service of its authority. Such warriors must properly be seen as the protectors of civilization, not its enemies. There is an even greater wisdom in the denial that politics and war belong with the same continuum. Unless we insist on denying it, our future, may belong to the men with bloodied hands. It is great to say that politics must continue but war cannot, but is it realistic For centuries war and politics have gone hand and hand. What events or individuals have given us a hope for change Are recent conflicts a testament to the future The United States involment in Bosnia, Somalia and the Gulf War has proven that. Would Keegan say that politics were not involved in those conflicts Keegan fails to address a few major conflicts in history. The Vietnam War and Korean War are not mentioned at all. The current theory underlying Vietnam and Korea were political reasons for the conflict. It is true that we went to Korea to support the South Koreans who were invaded but why were they invaded Political reasons are why. We were politically obligated to support the South Koreans. Chinas involment was purely political. The United States was not going to invade China. To the Chinese, having communist North Korea on their border was better than having the United States. Saying that Vietnam was not a political conflict does not give a reasonable explanation. The Vietnam War was the United States supporting a helpless South Vietnam and the United States fighting to keep their influence in South East Asia. With Keegans failure to address these major conflicts he leaves the reader wondering why. There are some errors of interpretation and fact in his novel as well. The atomic bomb was not designed to end wars without commitment of manpower on the battlefield as the author contends. The atomic bomb was another weapon, which we potentiality we only discovered after its use. Not until a decade later did nuclear weaponry come to take its place among equals in military establishments, at least in the United States. Keegans main goal was to refute the Clausewitz theory of war and politics. Keegan failed in this task. His inability to discuss such politically orientated conflicts such as Vietnam and Korea aids in his failure. His contention that World War I was not political was refuted by a definition in an encyclopedia. Keegan tries to offer the reader a new concept in studying military history but he is unable to get the reader to follow his train of thought. How to cite War and Politics: Are both one in the same, Essay examples
Sunday, April 26, 2020
Mini-Research Paper on Ã¢â¬Å"Death Be Not ProudÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ Essay Holy Sonnet 10 by John Donne is a powerful example of the strength that a sonnet can have at arousing deep emotion about lifeÃ¢â¬â¢s most powerful and immanent aspect- death. The sonnet demonstrates the writerÃ¢â¬â¢s own deep personal meaning toward death. Tina Skouen argues that Donne writes expressively and with passionate rhetoric about his feelings towards death. He tells the reader that of his belief that death is not the Mighty and dreadful (2) experience that people all fear. In line with SkouenÃ¢â¬â¢s analysis, DonneÃ¢â¬â¢s language Ã¢â¬Å"Mighty and dreadfulÃ¢â¬ explains how we the readers have a perceived notion of death that implies a fearful respect, which Donne thinks may be unnecessary. John Donne speaks to death in a personified way all throughout Holy Sonnet 10. Choosing to implement this literary technique, by treating death as a person, makes DonneÃ¢â¬â¢s ability to critique death more concrete. When Donne expresses his feelings regarding death to the reader by appearing to be speaking with death he is showing his perception of the mortality of death. Personification of death captures the entire significance and importance of the theme- that death is a part of personhood, not to be feared, but to be lived out to get one to a greater purpose. Skouen says that John Donnes feelings are displayed most strongly at the parts in the poem that personify death. I agree with this, and agree with her analysis that personification is the most important literary technique in the poem. Its use reiterates the central paradox that is the significant message- that in order to live eternally we must die. We will write a custom essay sample on Mini-Research Paper on Ã¢â¬Å"Death Be Not ProudÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Mini-Research Paper on Ã¢â¬Å"Death Be Not ProudÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Mini-Research Paper on Ã¢â¬Å"Death Be Not ProudÃ¢â¬ ¦Ã¢â¬ specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Donne implements additionally rhetorical devices to further explain his message of this central paradox. Skouen explains that Holy Sonnet 10 uses the metaphor of sleep to give examples of Donnes feelings of the evident lack of substance and power of death. Donne references the afterlife by using the metaphor One short sleep pastÃ¢â¬ ¦ death shall be no more (13-14). When Donne compares the relationship of death and afterlife to that of sleep and waking up, his metaphor encompasses the religious aspect of the theme by showing that death does not last forever. Instead he says it is a time between one life and the next. Eternally (13) also makes reference to a more pleasurable time, showing that the afterlife that comes from death will be pleasurable and everlasting. The metaphor says that since sleep is such a pleasurable activity, death must be even more pleasurable, since Donne believes that death is simply a deeper form of sleep. So death is not powerful, as people believe, but ins tead a more peaceful escape from life The same metaphor also makes reference to the pictures (5) of death, that of sleep, which tells the reader that when we sleep during life, it is simply a shortened version of death. This shows that death cannot as terrible as is everyone believed. The metaphor very effectively expresses the theme. It removes death from its mystery, and makes death seem simple and understandable. Skouen points out how DonneÃ¢â¬â¢s critiques the view of immortality and pride in death. He says, Thou art slave to fate, chance, kings, and desperate men (9). This comparison makes death seem to be dependant on outside forces other than its own, in particular, the forces of men. In his view of death as dependant on man, Donne shows us that rather than death being overpowering, man is in fact more in control of death than death is. An additional comparison Donne uses in explaining how death is short and not the eternal state of life is soonest our best men with thee do go, / Rest their bones, and souls delivery (7-8). The metaphor implies that death is sort-lived, a restÃ¢â¬ instead of an everlasting state. Works Cited Skouen, Tina. The Rhetoric of Passion in Donnes Holy Sonnets. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 27. 2 (2009): 159-165. Web. 27 Nov 2010. lt;http://www. jstor. org/stable/40232638gt;.
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Tiempo de espera green card de hermanos de ciudadano La peticiÃ ³n de una tarjeta de residencia, conocida como green card, que realiza un ciudadano americano para su hermano o hermana es uno de los trmites migratorios que ms tarda, desde los cinco hasta los veinte aÃ ±os de espera. AquÃ le explicamos el por quÃ ©. Bajo la ley de InmigraciÃ ³n, el Congreso de los Estados Unidos limita el nÃ ºmero de visas que se emiten de acuerdo al estatus del peticionario (esposa, hijo/a soltero/a, padres, hermano/a, hijo/a casado/a) y a su paÃ s de origen. El tiempo de espera depende entonces de estos dos factores: origen y categorÃ a. Los tiempos de espera dependen de la nacionalidad del pedido y de la relaciÃ ³n con el ciudadano, ya que cada paÃ s tiene una cuota lÃ mite y cada categorÃ a un nÃ ºmero determinado de visas otorgadas anualmente. Los hermanos y hermanas de los ciudadanos pertenecen a la categorÃ a F4, la Ã ºltima de las categorÃ as de preferencia familiar: El nÃ ºmero total de visas otorgadas para esta categorÃ a en el aÃ ±o 2018 ascendÃ an a las 65.000 con un tiempo de espera promedio de diez aÃ ±os, con menos y ms aÃ ±os dependiendo del caso. En esta categorÃ a estn incluidos los hermanos/as biolÃ ³gicos, los hermanos por adopciÃ ³n y los hermanastros/as. Si el consulado tiene duda acerca de la relaciÃ ³n entre el ciudadano y el beneficiario, puede solicitar una prueba de ADN. La espera Como norma, los servicios de ciudadanÃ a e inmigraciÃ ³n de los Estados Unidos (USCIS) tramitan las peticiones de tarjetas de residencia en orden de llegada de la peticiÃ ³n. La espera promedio es de diez aÃ ±os. Pero hay paÃ ses de origen cuyas visas se demoran ms que las otras: MÃ ©xico, China, India y Filipinas, cuyas esperas a veces ascienden a los veinte aÃ ±os. Es importante aclarar que no todos los casos son iguales y no todas las visas de las personas del mismo paÃ s de origen tardan el mismo tiempo. La clave es la fecha en la que la peticiÃ ³n fue aprobada (fecha de prioridad). Para que haya claridad, en el 2018 habÃ a 65.000 visas para otorgar pero miles de ms peticiones. Las que no clasifican en el cupo anual pasan al aÃ ±o siguiente, y asÃ sucesivamente hasta que obtienen su tarjeta de residencia. De ahÃ la espera. Vale la pena anotar que hay mucho rumor y desinformaciÃ ³n acerca de los tiempos de espera; siempre consulte las fuentes oficiales y no se deje guiar por lo que oye de otras personas. Cada caso es diferente. Para estar al corriente de sus tiempos de espera puede consultar la pgina de USCIS con su nÃ ºmero de caso a la mano. Breve descripciÃ ³n del proceso Para aclarar dudas y ayudarle a entender el proceso sepa que para pedir una green card para su hermano/a hay que: Ser ciudadano americano y haber cumplido ya los 21 aÃ ±os de edadTener solvencia econÃ ³mica para patrocinar al familiarLlenar y enviar el formulario I-130 Estar en contacto con el Centro Nacional de VisasEntender que una solicitud aprobada no es lo mismo que una visa aprobadaSaber quÃ © es la fecha de prioridadRevisar cada mes el BoletÃ n de Visas del Departamento de Estado y comprobar quÃ © fecha se est gestionando para calcular cunto tiempo ms queda para recibir la green cardRevisar el affidavit of supportÃ y tener claro sus requisitosPedir ayuda a un abogado si hay dudas en cÃ ³mo proceder Por Ã ºltimo: situaciones problemticas Hermano indocumentado: el problema con un hermano/a indocumentado en territorio de los Estados Unidos es que este/a no podrÃ a ajustar su estatus y podrÃ a aplicarse el castigo de los tres y de los diez aÃ ±os en el momento en que sale del paÃ s a presentarse a la entrevista en el consulado.PeticiÃ ³n negada: Si la peticiÃ ³n por una green card para su hermano/a fue negada, revise aquÃ las posibles causas.
Monday, March 2, 2020
How to Setup and Use SSH on a Raspberry PI SSH is a secure method of logging onto a remote computer. If your Pi is networked, then this can be a handy way of operating it from another computer or just copying files to or from it. First, you have to install the SSH service. This is done by this command: sudo apt-get install ssh After a couple of minutes, this will be complete. You can start the daemon (Unix name for a service) with this command from the terminal: sudo /etc/init.d/ssh start This init.d is used to start other daemons. For example, if you have Apache, MySQL, Samba etc. You can also stop the service with stop or restart it with restart. Have It Start at Bootup To set it up so the ssh server starts every time the Pi boots up, run this command once: sudo update-rc.d ssh defaults You can check that it worked by forcing your Pi to reboot with the reboot command: sudo reboot Then after rebooting try to connect to it using Putty or WinSCP (details below). Powering Down and Rebooting Its possible to corrupt your SD card with power offs before it halts. The result: reinstall everything. Only power down once you have fully shut down your Pi. Given its low power usage and little heat given off, you could probably leave it running 24x7. If you want to shut it down, use the shutdown command: sudo shutdown -h now Change -h to -r and it does the same as sudo reboot. Putty and WinSCP If youre accessing your Pi from the command line of a Windows/Linux or Mac PC then use Putty or the commercial (but free for private use) Tunnelier. Both are great for general browsing around your Pis folders and copying files to or from a Windows PC. Download them from these URLs: Putty Download PageWinSCP Download PageTunnelier: Powerful free to use Windows SFTP etc. Your Pi needs to be connected to your network before you use Putty or WinSCP and you need to know its IP address. On my network, my Pi is on 192.168.1.69. You can find yours by typing in /sbin/ifconfig and on the 2nd line of the output, youll see inet addr: followed by your IP address. For Putty, its easiest to download putty.exe or the zip file of all the exes and put them in a folder. When you run putty it pops up a configuration Window. Enter your IP address in the input field where it says Host Name (or IP address) and enter pi or any name there. Now click the save button then the open button at the bottom. Youll have to login into your pi but now you can use it as if you were actually there. This can be quite useful, as its far easier to cut and paste long text strings in via a putty terminal. Try running this command: ps ax That shows a list of processes running on your pi. These include ssh (the two sshd) and Samba (nmbd and smbd) and many others. PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND858 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/sshd866 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd -D887 ? Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd -D1092 ? Ss 0:00 sshd: pi [priv] WinSCP We find it most useful to set it up in two screen mode rather than in explorer mode but its easily changed in the Preferences. Also in preferences under Integration/Applications change the path to the putty.exe so you can easily jump into putty. When you connect to the pi, it starts at your home directory which is /home/pi. Click on the two .. to view the folder above and do it once more to get to the root. You can see all of the 20 Linux folders. After youve used a terminal for a while youll see a hidden file .bash_history (not that well hidden!). This is a text file of your command history with all the commands youve used before so copy it, edit out the stuff you dont want and keep the useful commands somewhere safe.